New Issue Brief Highlights SORH SUD Work

i Nov 1st No Comments by

by Beth Blevins

Funding from HRSA’s Rural Communities Opioid Response Program (RCORP) program has helped several State Offices of Rural Health (SORHs) recently start—or strengthen—their work related to substance use disorder and opioid use disorder (S/OUD). Those who receive the RCORP Planning grant have a year to create or strengthen a consortium focused on SUD/OUD. (HRSA currently offers an RCORP Implementation grant that some SORH have received as well.)

The new “SORH Response to the SUD Crisis” issue brief provides a scan of what SORH are doing to engage in the recent substance use disorder (SUD) and opioid use disorder (OUD) initiatives in their state.

For example, the South Carolina Office of Rural Health (SCORH) had never focused on S/OUD activities prior to receiving the RCORP Planning grant, according to Lindsey Kilgo, SCORH Director of Network Development.  For them the grant was “about how we can understand what’s going on in the state,” Kilgo said. “There’s been a lot of information gathering, a lot of consortium and office conversations, a lot of convening and bringing folks together.”

Forging Stronger Partnerships

While creating their consortium, the Virginia SORH (VA SORH) discovered new partners. “There are additional people at the table who might not have been there because of the consortium,” said Heather Anderson, VA SORH Director. “We added to the conversation and got community health centers and other folks that maybe weren’t involved before. We have stronger partnerships in the region.”

Anderson continued, “Because of our experience with the planning grant, another agency was willing to run with the implementation grant. So we said, ‘Go for it. You’re local, you know all the people. We will support you any way we can, give you technical assistance, and help you convene people.’”

For the Michigan Center for Rural Health (MCRH), the planning grant “has allowed us to really bring everybody to the table and wrap our arms around the importance of the challenges in those counties we are working in,” said Crystal Barter, MCRH Director of Performance Improvement. “I think everyone has really bought into it, whereas before everyone was working in their own silo. And now we are working as a consortium and starting to leverage the resources each organization has.”

Hanneke Van Dyke, former SORH Coordinator at the Texas SORH, also talked about the importance of community outreach. “It was important to use relationships we already had and having an openness to expanding relationships to new project areas,” Van Dyke said. “In both of our (RCORP) project areas, community advisory councils—made up of community members and community leaders who are there for every step of the process—have been central. Making sure we built in a few back routes tied back to the community was very important for us.”

No Prior Expertise Needed

When asked what skills are needed for SORHs to engage with S/OUD work, Kilgo replied, “Having the determination to make things better and to make change—and then not being afraid to ask questions, in an effort to build knowledge, partnerships, and relationships.” Kilgo added, “For folks who work in this particular realm, it requires a level of passion and commitment. And when you have that shared passion and commitment, the relationship and trust come fairly easily. We all have a common vision and common theme. We’re moving forward together in a positive manner.”

The ability to seek out experts was also key for Van Dyke. “None of us on staff had worked on an S/OUD issues or had any particular training or experience with it,” she said. “As project coordinator, I’ve taken it on to educate myself through reading and talking with experts. I’m not an expert but I’m pretty comfortable now, knowing who to go to to get the right information.”

Although the North Dakota Center for Rural Health (NDCRH) has been involved with S/OUD activities for the state for a few years, they had no broad expertise in their office when they started their RCORP work, said Lynette Dickson, NDCRH Director. “Our knowledge has grown and continues to grow,” Dickson said.

“Even if you are not an expert in the field you can still have an impact in this arena,” Dickson explained. “Because what we (SORHs) do is convene people, and reach out and find the resources. You can have more confidence that you can have an active role in this—you can convene and connect like we do with anything else.”

For more information, see the new NOSORH Issue Brief, SORH Response to the National Substance Use Crisis. A full spectrum of NOSORH resources to address rural SUD/OUD are available in the Rural Opioids Educational Resources library on the NOSORH website.

August 2019

i Aug 21st No Comments by

Crystal Barter
Michigan Center for Rural Health
Director of Performance Improvement
NOSORH Member Since 2009

Favorite thing about working at a SORH: The SORH “family”. NOSORH does an excellent job in building a community among the SORHs. I feel very grateful to have developed deep professional and personal relationships with many SORH personnel across the nation over the last ten years.

What I’m working on right now: Launching the Rural Communities Opioid Response Program – Implementation funding. MCRH facilitated forming the Northern MI Opioid Response Consortium, covering 16 rural counties, under the RCORP-Planning funding and are now able to move the work forward with the implementation funding!

Best advice I ever received: “Good for her! Not for me.” Very helpful as a fairly new mom navigating everything you are “supposed” to be doing.
“Be part of the solution. Don’t sit around being negative and pointing out obstacles.”
“Surround yourself with good people.”
Oh, and “Enjoy the WOW that is happening now.” That last one is from my three year old’s favorite show, Daniel Tiger.

What I’m currently reading: I just finished “Love Thy Neighbor” and “In Shock” – Both excellent books focused on aspects of healthcare. I am excited to dive into “Save Me the Plums” which is Ruth Reichl’s (former food magazine editor) memoir.

3 great things about rural health in Michigan: 1) The MICAH QN. This impressive group of quality leaders take pride in improving not only their organization, but work together to lift all CAHs in Michigan. 2) The collaborative nature among organizations and stakeholders focused on improving the health of rural MI residents and teams. 3) My colleagues. The MCRH team is strong in their commitment to assisting rural communities on everything rural health. I’m so proud to work with each and every one of them.

Last place I traveled to: The beautiful Upper Peninsula of Michigan. If you haven’t been, it is worth a trip. I was reminded how accessible it was to see truly beautiful scenery, and how much of it there is in Michigan!

Who inspires you? At this phase in life, I’m really inspired by strong women who are making it work (whatever that means for them). This includes the likes of women like RBG, but also the women in my life who are navigating their own journeys and figuring out what happiness means for them. There are quite a few NOSORH women on that list!

Promising Practice: Michigan Center for Rural Health Plays Unique Role in Hospital Quality Improvement

i Mar 30th No Comments by

by Beth Blevins

In the quest for hospital quality improvement, the Michigan Center for Rural Health (MCRH) is playing a unique role, serving as a liaison between independent Critical Access Hospitals (CAHs) in the state and the state’s hospital association.

“Usually we hear of SORH (State Office of Rural Health) Flex programs subcontracting work to their local hospital association,” said Crystal Barter, MCRH Director of Performance Improvement. “This is the opposite situation—the hospital association subcontracts with our Flex program. Due to the nature of our work, we have a robust relationship with all 21 of the independent CAHs in the state—our Flex program acts as an improvement liaison for them—so it makes sense for MHA (Michigan Hospital Association) to leverage that relationship as they work to improve patient safety and quality across the entire State of Michigan.”

In September 2016, MHA’s Keystone Center was awarded a (HIIN) contract by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). The goals of HIIN are focused on reducing the rates of readmissions and hospital-acquired conditions (HACs) such as pressure ulcers, sepsis, and surgical site infections. Under the contract, the Keystone Center partnered with the Illinois and Wisconsin hospital associations to form the , with the aim of reducing HACs by 20 percent and readmissions by 12 percent from a 2014 baseline.

MICAH QN Member, Amanda Knuth, Spectrum Health Reed City, providing peer education on Infection Prevention and Antimicrobial Stewardship at the MICAH QN Annual Meeting.

“The Keystone Center is a national leader in quality and patient safety,” Barter said. “We’ve had a long partnership with them on a variety of initiatives, but this is the first time they’ve formally sub-contracted with us to ensure that the independent CAHs in our state have a resource outside of their entity to work on HIIN.”

The program builds on what Barter calls a “long-standing quality network” that MCRH, with Flex funding, supports for all CAHs in the state. MCRH hosts quarterly meetings, a listserv, and strategy group meetings for the quality network. “We want to make sure that HIIN work is engrained in the quality network and they don’t feel like they are two separate initiatives,” she said.

Barter continued, “When we talk about HIIN work, it’s more of a cultural change within an organization versus a specific initiative that we’re working on and then move away from. We want it to be the foundation for all of their other patient safety work as well.”

HIIN requires hospitals in the program to follow a matrix, submitting monthly data with the goal of improving their baseline. “What I do on a regular basis,” Barter said, “is monitor the data submission metrics, then work with Keystone staff to put improvement actions into the hospitals based upon the data.”

MICAH QN Executive Committee members holding the Certificate of Achievement recognizing Michigan as a Top 10 State for CAH Quality Performance.

In addition, Barter meets with MHA staff regularly and they attend the quarterly network meetings. “There’s that face-to-face communication that happens quite often,” she said. “We sit down and look at the data and determine if it’s something that can be improved upon by either bringing in a consultant or learning from their peers, or we determine what an appropriate resource might be and go from there. At the end of the day it’s up to the MHA staff to give it the final say because they have the funds, but they do keep us looped in on that conversation and appreciate the insight that we can provide.”

Kristy M. Shafer-Swadley, coordinator of patient safety and quality at MHA Keystone Center, praised the strong partnership between the MHA Keystone Center and MCRH. “We continually apprise each other on any updates, needs, or initiatives,” Shafer-Swadley said.  “MCRH and the MICAH Quality Network have established trust within the group of CAHs, and members feel safe to share and collectively help and support one another. Working together helps our members know we’re a unified team and they can come with questions to either of us.  MCRH and MHA Keystone Center interact with CAHs in different areas at various times, therefore it’s beneficial for us to support each other in order to best support our hospitals.”

Barter said she hopes other SORHs will consider this kind of arrangement because it offers financial benefits. “Absolutely other SORHs could do this,” she said. “SORHs may be used to taking an aspect of their Flex grant and sub-contracting it to the hospital association to implement, and not vice-versa. SORHs can leverage their value and reputation among rural providers to obtain the sub-contracts themselves and get additional revenue.”

Another benefit, Barter said, is the learning opportunities this arrangement affords. “I’ve been able to learn a ton about the concepts within patient safety that before I only knew of in a broad fashion,” she said.  “It’s a good opportunity for SORHs to build internal capacity as well.”

Does your SORH have a “Promising Practice”? We’re interested in the innovative, effective and valuable work that SORHs are doing. Contact to set up a short email or phone interview in which you can tell your story!

Michigan Center for Rural Health Helps Rural ACOs Get Off the Ground

i Jan 31st No Comments by

By: Beth Blevins

The goal of Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) is to reduce costs while improving patient care. The Michigan Center for Rural Health (MCRH) is helping two ACOs in their state do just that.

“This is all about changing from volume to value in primary care outpatient settings for Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries,” said John Barnas, executive director of MCRH. “It’s a care coordination primary care model where primary care providers work together to reduce costs and improve the health outcome.”

After CMS released the guidance for (AIM) grants in November 2014, which provided $114 million in federal grants to help rural facilities make the transition to ACOs, MCRH went to work to promote the idea in their state. “Between November until the deadline at the end of May 2015, we did a lot of outreach,” Barnas said. “We emailed and called a lot of people and held meetings.” As a result of their advocacy, two rural ACOs were formed in January 2016, the and the .

Barnas is listed as the Executive Director of both ACOs. On a day-to-day basis, that means MCRH assists the ACOs in project management and is a meeting convener for them. “We coordinate all the board meetings and minutes and run ad hoc meetings,” Barnas said. “And we set up listservs for every group involved.” In addition, the ACOs can tap into all of MCRH’s resources. For example, he said, if there is a recruitment issue, they can get help from Rachel Ruddock, MCRH’s physician recruiter or, if they need distance education, they can get help from Victoria Lantzy, who runs MCRH’s webinars.

One reason for the success of their partnership with the rural ACOs, Barnas said, is that MCRH is one of only three non-profit State Offices of Rural Health. This gives them “the latitude and freedom to partner on other projects.”

Caravan Health provides backroom analytics for the ACOs by merging a patient’s electronic health record with Medicare claims-based data, a necessary requirement of being an ACO. Through those analytics, Barnas said, “They can see exactly how many times a patient in one of the ACOs has seen the physician, where they’ve seen the physician, the diagnoses, the cost, and number of co-morbidities they have. In this way, they can start identifying high-cost patients whose care they want to coordinate to drive down the costs. Without the claims, you’re just guessing.” In addition, Caravan offers quarterly training for care coordinators and provides a financial consultant that reviews each ACO’s financial data and how it’s doing on the 34 ACO quality metrics.

A year into the rural ACO program, both ACOs are seeing benefits. One of the ACOs decreased Medicare spending by 3 percent.

“There’s an increased focus on those patients who need it the most,” said Sara Wright, MCRH’s Rural Health Improvement Coordinator.  “The patients who overuse the ER, or are using it in an inappropriate fashion, and the patients who have multiple co-morbidities are finally getting a care coordinator who can focus on them. We also are starting to have more conversations about what factors outside clinical care affects their health, such as their home environment.”

According to Barnas, another benefit of this ACO program is that it allows waivers for transportation, durable medical equipment, and medication. For example, a transportation waiver lets hospitals help patients get to and from appointments.

“Here’s a true story,” Barnas said. “There was a diabetic patient who continued to go to the ER three or four times a month. The care coordinator did a home visit and found out that the patient’s refrigerator continuously shut down and her medication was going bad. A waiver allowed them to buy a small dorm fridge to keep her insulin safe. So the hospital spent $79 on a refrigerator instead of hundreds of dollars on continued ER visits.”

Going forward, Barnas said, because this is a three-year demonstration project, the facilities will have to decide if they want to remain in the ACOs. “If so,” he said, “we have to find a funding mechanism to continue paying Caravan Health. We’ll start engaging them in that conversation at some point this year.”

Crystal Barter- November 2015

i Jun 8th No Comments by

Crystal Barter is the Director of Performance Improvement for the Michigan Center for Rural Health. She came to the Center through an AmeriCorps position a little over 6 years ago. Crystal grew up in the “Asparagus Capitol of the Nation” in Hart, MI on Lake Michigan.

Q. What is the most interesting thing you are working on right now?
We are working on three innovative projects that I am very excited about right now.

The MCRH is a partner in a Practice Transformation Network Award. As part of this three state initiative, we will be working with rural healthcare providers, including certified RHCs and rural private practices in achieving large-scale health transformation. This includes sharing, adapting and further developing comprehensive quality improvement strategies and operational efficiencies.

The MCRH is partnering with the Michigan Health & Hospital Association Keystone Group to participate in the Hospital Engagement Network 2.0. The MCRH will work with the 20 independent CAHs in Michigan as a quality improvement coordinator. The work focuses on the culture of patient safety within an organization.

The MCRH assisted in submitting two CMS ACO Investment Model applications as part of the Medicare Shared Savings Program. The ACO participants include 17 rural hospitals and 1 rural FQHC. They had their first joint meeting of rural ACOs in August and will be hosted their second one in November.

Q. What is one characteristic that you believe every SORH leader should possess?
Flexibility. Every day we are presented with new challenges and opportunities, so it’s important to be willing to change your planned course of action if it’s needed. Also, I think that building and maintaining partnerships is a vital characteristic of successful SORH leaders.

Q. What are you doing to ensure you continue to grow and develop as a SORH leader?
Saying yes to new opportunities and looking at them as learning opportunities instead of increased workload is something I strive to do.  It’s important to view new challenges as a way to build skills.

Q. What is the biggest challenge facing SORH leaders today?
I think prioritizing is one of the biggest challenges. There are so many resources that SORHs can offer, and so many competing priorities that one must be able to analyze and determine what makes the most sense for their state. Also, in my position, I cannot be a subject matter expert on everything and sometimes I find it frustrating not being able to answer a very technical question. But, working with partners, I know that we will be able to find the correct answer and get back to our SORH audience.

Q. What are your top three goals for 2016?

  1. Finishing my Master’s as I am two classes away from obtaining my Master’s in Healthcare Administration.
  2. Assisting John and the rest of the staff in expanding MCRH staff, resources, and diversifying our revenue stream
  3. Continuously improving leadership and management skills

Promising Practices: Michigan RHC Network Puts Emphasis on Quality: September 2013

i Mar 18th No Comments by

Peer-to-peer sharing is one of the benefits of the Michigan Rural Health Clinic Quality Network (MI RHC QN), sponsored  by the Michigan Center for Rural Health (MCRH). What started as a small, informal quality network with only 15 active members in June 2011 has continued to grow and gain enthusiastic members. Today, representatives from over 50 of  Michigan’s 170 clinics participate in the network and attend its quarterly meetings held in Mt. Pleasant, Mich.

“When members want to talk about quality improvement initiatives in their clinics, we make sure they’re on the agenda,” said Crystal Barter, MCRH Health Systems Development Coordinator, who coordinates the network. “It doesn’t matter  what initiative they choose, as long as it has made an impact in their clinic and they feel their peers would benefit from  listening to it.”

The quality network is part of the MCRH’s recent effort to ramp up their work with RHCs, which also includes a focus on  ICD-10 and practice management, according to John Barnas, director of the MCRH. In the past year, MCRH has been going  through a process of getting clinics to collect a cohesive set of data, Barnas said. This has become increasingly important  because insurance companies are giving RHCs incentive payments based on data and because of the implementation of  meaningful use standards for Medicaid patients.

MCRH looked at a core group of RHCs in the quality network and compared what they were doing with various initiatives,  and came up with a set of Quality Assessment Performance Improvement Measures. The measures include three core  measures that network members must collect at minimum—for high blood pressure, tobacco use, and BMI (body mass  index). (An Excel file of the measures is available on the RHC section of the MCRH web site).

Participation in the MI RHC QN and its quality collection is voluntary. “There’s no monetary incentive right now,” Barnas  said. “These people are driven to do the right thing. We pay for their travel and buy them lunch. They like having the chance to get together. But we think eventually CMS is going to require this type of thing—to prove you’ve had some kind of impact.”

If other SORHs are interested in sponsoring a RHC quality network, Barnas suggests that they use their annual rural health  conferences to convene a meeting for it. There’s a tool already out there for them to dump and track their data in real  time, he said, called Quality Health Indicators (QHi).

Template Letter from Michigan Rural Hospital CEOs October 19, 2011

i Feb 11th No Comments by

Template Letter from Michigan Rural Hospital CEOs October 19, 2011

Michigan Letter to Super Committee Regarding EMS Services November 2, 2011

i Feb 11th No Comments by

Michigan Letter to Super Committee Regarding EMS Services November 2, 2011

Michigan RHC Network Puts Emphasis on Quality

i Jan 16th No Comments by

Michigan RHC Network Puts Emphasis on Quality The Branch: September 2013

Tri-State (Michigan, Minnesota, Wisconsin) Health Professional Workforce Analysis – September 2008

i Dec 16th No Comments by

Tri-State (Michigan, Minnesota, Wisconsin) Health Professional Workforce Analysis – September 2008